February 2, 2010
9:55 PM | 
Posted by
keith
On the back of the Battlefield Bad Company 2 box, the score given to it by Gameinformer is shown.
Congrats to DICE and Bad Company 2, as the game gets a 9.5 out of 10. This certainly shows a lot of promise to those who were still borderline on getting the game.
Also, don't forget the first releases (which are all LE editions) contain downloadable content as well!
Bad Company 2 is set to release March 2.
Labels:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Custom Search
Share This
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Blog Roll
Bad Company 2 Gameplay
What Are You Gettin' in March?
16 comments:
How could they rate the game already? Did they really get the demo disc that early?
im buying no matter what,but they gave mw2 a 9.75 didnt they,i didnt really get into mw2 but i really enjoyed the bfbc2 beta.also m.a.g. is awsome dont trust reviewers there really not getting that it really is a campaign coop multiplayer gaame all in one form.
Im in the beta and this game is AMAZING
Yes, they can get the review disc pretty early. We had KZ2 review copies almost three months prior to release of the game.
The beta is amazing :]
Beta is awesome on PC also. The buildings falling apart is the killer in this game xD
Congrats, I was a big fan of COD4, but Modern warfare 2 doesn't do it for me , I think the maps are uninspired, and the kill streaks cheapen then game as do the campers. It's only average. This game is better, the demo on 360 proved that to me. Which is a shock as I didn't think it would have been possible before Modern warfare 2 was released.
i would of gave it a 5/10 the game sucks, bad, slow, and unresponsive controls, poor graphics, the stupid spawn system, and huge maps = no fun.
The back of that box just got me interested... it did its job
you would gave 5/10 to bc2? wow ur certainly fucked up in ur head dude, u must be one of those 10 year old retards who praise cod. u fail.
9.5, very happy about that....now I'm gonna go wank to the thought of even higher scores!
DX11 BFBC2 = Nasty 9.5
Anonymous said...
(i would of gave it a 5/10 the game sucks, bad, slow, and unresponsive controls, poor graphics, the stupid spawn system, and huge maps = no fun).
Um well lets see here, graphics are superior to alot of other first person shooters out there and the enhanced destruction engine adds to the great engine which battlefield runs on. I don't understand how you find the re-spawn system stupid, spawning at your base or on one of your squad mates is alot better then spawning and having an AC 130 spawn kill you like in modern warfare. If you don't like a realistic shooter with huge environments then go play call of duty.
This games gunna be sick!!! I've been playin the demo nonstop since it came out.
Average graphics, buggy, bad performance, average sound and destruction of buildings not as cool as many people say it is. I give it a 6 out of 10.
I tried the latest beta, it's a disappointing game, don't believe the fanboys. Score 6.5
Post a Comment